Neuro Lab · DeCure for X

DeCure for Spinocerebellar ataxia type 27

DeCure's autonomous Neuro AI scientist is researching a drug-repurposing hypothesis for spinocerebellar ataxia type 27 — screening already-approved drugs against its 1-gene Open Targets disease module to publish open-access research. Research is fast; the path to publication is funded in milestone stages.

Disease module1 genesLead labNeuro
All cures
NeuroDOID:0050976$DeCureNeuro

The disease map

Disease moduleSpinocerebellar ataxia type 27 maps to a 1-gene Open Targets module — the target space DeCure's AI scientist screens approved drugs against.
DeCure.ai methodSignature reversal (LINCS) plus network proximity (STRING) rank already-approved drugs likely to perturb this module — the same engine that produces DeCure.ai's repurposing hypotheses.
Repurposing thesisScreening approved medicines against this disease module, then publishing the evidence for the strongest candidate. Known pharmacology and human exposure data make the first question sharper — they do not establish safety or efficacy in a new indication.

Research record

01
ResearchComing soon
Candidate research + dossier — target rationale, drug-repurposing thesis and evidence pack.proof: Published dossier + on-chain hash
02
ValidationComing soon
In-vitro biological validation at a contract research org (CRO).proof: CRO contract + in-vitro report
03
Peer review & paperComing soon
Peer-reviewed paper published open-access (preprint + journal).proof: DOI + open-access link + on-chain hash

Current lead

No approved-drug candidate for spinocerebellar ataxia type 27 is corroborated in the literature DeepSearch retrieved. Some conditions are managed with non-pharmacological care — a device, surgery or physical therapy — rather than a medicine; that may be the case here, or the literature we found may simply be too sparse yet to support a drug-repurposing angle.

Evidence

Retrieved by DeepSearch across 234,678,978 indexed works and resolved on OpenAlex — ranked by citations, including the results that did not work.

Movement Disorders Clinical Practice · 2025 · 4 citations · open access

Longitudinal Changes in Patient‐ and Clinical‐Reported Outcomes in Early Spinocerebellar Ataxia Types 1, 2, 3, and 6 from the <scp>IDEA</scp> Study

AbstractBACKGROUND: Clinical outcomes assessments (COAs) in spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) need to be standardized, ataxia-specific, sensitive to change, clinically relevant, and meaningful to patients. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the longitudinal 1- and 2-year performances of different patient reported outcomes, including the Patient Reported Outcome Measure of Ataxia (PROM-Ataxia), and clinician reported outcomes, including FARS and SARA, in those with early manifest symptoms of SCA 1, 2, 3, and 6. METHODS: We studied 53 patients with early stage SCA1-3 and SCA6 from The Instrumented Data Exchange for Ataxia Study and 24 age-matched healthy controls. Participants were seen every 6 months for 2 years. Mixed models were used to estimate change over 12- and 24-months of follow-up. Changes on the FARS-FS and PGI-C were used as anchors to estimate meaningful changes. RESULTS: Among persons with SCA, mean age was 48.7 years and mean SARA score was 9.3. Few measures showed statistically significant changes at 12 months. At 24-months, the FARS-ADL, PROM-Ataxia total, PROM-Ataxia physical, and PROM-Ataxia ADL scores showed the strongest associations of change. CONCLUSIONS: Patient reported or derived outcome measures, such as FARS-ADL and ADL sub domain of the PROM-Ataxia, can capture longitudinal change in patients' symptom experience over a 2-year period and its impact on daily activities, even in those with early disease. More work is needed to identify outcomes that reliably capture change earlier.

https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.14323
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · 2003 · 4 citations

Spinocerebellar degeneration

AbstractThe spinocerebellar degenerations/ataxias (SCAs) are a diverse group of rare, slowly progressive, neurological diseases, often inherited but of incompletely understood pathophysiology, which affect the cerebellum and its related pathways. They have few animal models and share no reliable biomarkers. They have, as yet, no universally validated rating scale for use in clinical trials. In the past 25 years, there have been, at most, 18 controlled (Class 1) trials for ataxia, which have focused on neurotransmitter mechanisms. There is currently only one National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-sponsored drug trial for ataxia (Phase I study of idebenone in Friedreich's ataxia). There are, as yet, no FDA-approved drugs for SCA. Current treatment practices encompass rehabilitation interventions and off-label use of symptomatic medications [1,2].

https://doi.org/10.1517/14656566.4.10.1637

Disease module: DeepOracle (Open Targets). Structures: RDKit from PubChem SMILES. Literature: retrieved by DeepSearch across 234,678,978 indexed works (targeted per-candidate search), resolved on OpenAlex.

DeCure is a research and publication project, not medical advice and not a treatment. "DeCure for X" describes a research goal, not a claim that a cure exists. Backing a cure is a contribution to fund the research — it is not an investment, and confers no yield, royalty, equity or IP ownership. Papers are published open-access by the DeCure.ai DAO.