Neuro Lab · DeCure for X

DeCure for Spinocerebellar ataxia type 2

DeCure's autonomous Neuro AI scientist is researching a drug-repurposing hypothesis for spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 — screening already-approved drugs against its 11-gene Open Targets disease module to publish open-access research. Research is fast; the path to publication is funded in milestone stages.

Disease module11 genesLead labNeuro
All cures
NeuroDOID:0050955$DeCureNeuro

The disease map

Disease moduleSpinocerebellar ataxia type 2 maps to a 11-gene Open Targets module — the target space DeCure's AI scientist screens approved drugs against.
DeCure.ai methodSignature reversal (LINCS) plus network proximity (STRING) rank already-approved drugs likely to perturb this module — the same engine that produces DeCure.ai's repurposing hypotheses.
Repurposing thesisScreening approved medicines against this disease module, then publishing the evidence for the strongest candidate. Known pharmacology and human exposure data make the first question sharper — they do not establish safety or efficacy in a new indication.

Research record

01
ResearchComing soon
Candidate research + dossier — target rationale, drug-repurposing thesis and evidence pack.proof: Published dossier + on-chain hash
02
ValidationComing soon
In-vitro biological validation at a contract research org (CRO).proof: CRO contract + in-vitro report
03
Peer review & paperComing soon
Peer-reviewed paper published open-access (preprint + journal).proof: DOI + open-access link + on-chain hash

Current lead

No approved-drug candidate for spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 is corroborated in the literature DeepSearch retrieved. Some conditions are managed with non-pharmacological care — a device, surgery or physical therapy — rather than a medicine; that may be the case here, or the literature we found may simply be too sparse yet to support a drug-repurposing angle.

Molecular view

sodium voltage-gated channel alpha subunit 9 (SCN9A)SCN9A is one of the genes genetically linked to this disease in Open Targets — shown as context, not as a drug target we're pursuing: no approved-drug candidate for this disease is yet corroborated in the literature we found.

Loading structure…
helix sheet rdrag to rotate · scroll to zoom

RCSB Protein Data Bank · entry 7W9K · 2.2 Å · ligand O-[(R)-{[(2R)-2,3-bis(octadecanoyloxy)propyl]oxy}(hydroxy)phosphoryl]-L-serine (P5S). Experimental structure, not a prediction.

What the evidence adds up to

Spinocerebellar ataxia type 2 is one of more than 30 dominantly inherited spinocerebellar ataxias for which causative mutations have been identified. The disorder belongs to the expanded polyglutamine group, and evidence supports a toxic protein mechanism in which protein misfolding and perturbations in nuclear events are key events in pathogenesis. Despite this progress, the pathophysiology remains incompletely understood, there are few animal models, and no reliable biomarkers exist. As of 2003, there were no FDA-approved drugs for any spinocerebellar ataxia, and only 18 controlled Class 1 trials for ataxia had ever been conducted, all focused on neurotransmitter mechanisms. A 2011 review confirmed that effective therapies for ataxias were still lacking.

A 2013 review of physical therapy for spinocerebellar ataxia identified 13 relevant studies from 2001 to 2011, all of which reported improvement of symptoms. The authors noted methodological limitations and called for greater rigour in future research. A 2023 article on stem cell therapy cautioned that while stem cells hold great potential, they may not be the answer for all such diseases, and emphasised the need for physicians and patients to understand the indications, ethical considerations, and potential side effects. A 2025 review stated that spinocerebellar ataxias remain incurable, though certain medications and physical therapy can alleviate symptoms, and expressed high hopes that gene therapy methods might slow or stop disease progression.

What is still missing are validated rating scales universally accepted for clinical trials, reliable biomarkers, adequate animal models, and sufficient funding for controlled trials. Patient stratification by genetic subtype and disease stage has not been systematically addressed in drug trials, and no disease-modifying therapy has been proven in a randomised controlled trial for spinocerebellar ataxia type 2.

Evidence

Retrieved by DeepSearch across 234,678,978 indexed works and resolved on OpenAlex — ranked by citations, including the results that did not work.

Current Opinion in Neurology · 2007 · 151 citations

Spinocerebellar ataxias: an update

AbstractPURPOSE OF REVIEW: Here we discuss recent advances regarding the molecular genetic basis of dominantly inherited ataxias. RECENT FINDINGS: Important recent observations include insights into the mechanisms by which expanded polyglutamine causes cerebellar degeneration; new findings regarding how noncoding expansions may cause disease; the discovery that conventional (i.e. nonrepeat) mutations underlie recently identified ataxias; and growing recognition that multiple biological pathways, when perturbed, can cause cerebellar degeneration. SUMMARY: The dominant ataxias, also known as spinocerebellar ataxias, continue to grow in number. Here we review the major categories of spinocerebellar ataxias: expanded polyglutamine ataxias; noncoding repeat ataxias; and ataxias caused by conventional mutations. After discussing features shared by these disorders, we present recent evidence supporting a toxic protein mechanism for the polyglutamine spinocerebellar ataxias and the recognition that both protein misfolding and perturbations in nuclear events represent key events in pathogenesis. Less is known about pathogenic mechanisms in spinocerebellar ataxias due to noncoding repeats, though a toxic RNA effect remains possible. Newly discovered, conventional mutations in spinocerebellar ataxias suggest a wide range of biological pathways can be disrupted to cause progressive ataxia. Finally, we discuss how new mechanistic insights can drive the push toward preventive treatment.

https://doi.org/10.1097/wco.0b013e3281fbd3dd
Movement Disorders · 2011 · 94 citations · open access

Milestones in ataxia

AbstractThe past 25 years have seen enormous progress in the deciphering of the genetic and molecular basis of ataxias, resulting in improved understanding of their pathogenesis. The most significant milestones during this period were the cloning of the genes associated with the common spinocerebellar ataxias, ataxia telangiectasia, and Friedreich ataxia. To date, the causative mutations of more than 30 spinocerebellar ataxias and 20 recessive ataxias have been identified. In addition, there are numerous acquired ataxias with defined molecular causes, so that the entire number of distinct ataxia disorders exceeds 50 and possibly approaches 100. Despite this enormous heterogeneity, a few recurrent pathophysiological themes stand out. These include protein aggregation, failure of protein homeostasis, perturbations in ion channel function, defects in DNA repair, and mitochondrial dysfunction. The clinical phenotypes of the most common ataxia disorders have been firmly established, and their natural history is being studied in ongoing large observational trials. Effective therapies for ataxias are still lacking. However, novel drug targets are under investigation, and it is expected that there will be an increasing number of therapeutic trials in ataxia.

https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.23559
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · 2003 · 4 citations

Spinocerebellar degeneration

AbstractThe spinocerebellar degenerations/ataxias (SCAs) are a diverse group of rare, slowly progressive, neurological diseases, often inherited but of incompletely understood pathophysiology, which affect the cerebellum and its related pathways. They have few animal models and share no reliable biomarkers. They have, as yet, no universally validated rating scale for use in clinical trials. In the past 25 years, there have been, at most, 18 controlled (Class 1) trials for ataxia, which have focused on neurotransmitter mechanisms. There is currently only one National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-sponsored drug trial for ataxia (Phase I study of idebenone in Friedreich's ataxia). There are, as yet, no FDA-approved drugs for SCA. Current treatment practices encompass rehabilitation interventions and off-label use of symptomatic medications [1,2].

https://doi.org/10.1517/14656566.4.10.1637
Revista Neurociências · 2013 · 3 citations · open access

Atendimento Fisioterapêutico para Indivíduos com Ataxia Espinocerebelar: Uma Revisão da Literatura

AbstractThe spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) is a disorder characterized by deficits in the execution of coordinated movements with progressive postural sway associated with difficulty in maintaining balance and various other motor disorders. The gait may be ataxic, with broadening the base of support, instability, irregular steps and slow, lateropulsion and trembling in range of motion, so that physical therapy is an important alternative for the improvement of the disorders of this pathology. Objective. Make, based on scientific literature, a review of physical therapy strategies in the treatment of spinocerebellar ataxia. Method. The study researches the databases Medline and SciELO from 2001 to 2011, considering the following keywords: ataxia espinocerebelar, Fisioterapia, tratamento, reabilitação and its correlates in English. Results. We found 33 studies that had as its main theme ataxia, 20 articles were excluded because they did not report the physical therapy approach for this type of pathology. After review, 13 references were used. Conclusions. After this study, the importance of physical ther­apy in the treatment of patients with SCA becomes obvious, accord­ing to the benefits promoted, as all studies found an improvement of symptoms of this pathology. Methodological limitations observed suggest the need for greater rigor in future research.

https://doi.org/10.4181/rnc.2013.21.777.10p
Annals of Movement Disorders · 2023 · 0 citations · open access

Stem cell therapy for spinocerebellar ataxias

AbstractStem cells have proved to be the “wonder treatment” for various genetic diseases and holds great potential for the treatment of numerous, but presently incurable maladies. However, stem cells may not be the answer for all such diseases. With the rampant growth of clinics offering stem cell therapy for almost every incurable disease, it is prudent that the indications, ethical considerations, and potential side effects of this treatment are known to the physicians and patients. In this article, we have summarized the available evidence on stem cell therapy in spinocerebellar ataxias.

https://doi.org/10.4103/aomd.aomd_48_22
Yakut Medical Journal · 2025 · 0 citations · open access

Approaches to the treatment of autosomal-dominant spinocerebellar ataxias

AbstractThe article is devoted to the prospects for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases with dynamic mutations based on published studies of the search for approaches to the treatment of spinocerebellar ataxia. Although these diseases are incurable, research results show that certain medications and physical therapy can alleviate the symptoms of cerebellar ataxia. Due to the progress made in the study of spinocerebellar ataxia in recent years, there are high hopes that it will be possible to develop gene therapy methods that will slow down the progression of the disease or even stop its development.

https://doi.org/10.25789/ymj.2025.92.24

Disease module: DeepOracle (Open Targets). Structures: RDKit from PubChem SMILES. Literature: retrieved by DeepSearch across 234,678,978 indexed works (targeted per-candidate search), resolved on OpenAlex.

DeCure is a research and publication project, not medical advice and not a treatment. "DeCure for X" describes a research goal, not a claim that a cure exists. Backing a cure is a contribution to fund the research — it is not an investment, and confers no yield, royalty, equity or IP ownership. Papers are published open-access by the DeCure.ai DAO.