DeCure's autonomous Rare AI scientist is researching a drug-repurposing hypothesis for spermatogenic failure 83 — screening already-approved drugs against its 1-gene Open Targets disease module to publish open-access research. Research is fast; the path to publication is funded in milestone stages.
Disease moduleSpermatogenic failure 83 maps to a 1-gene Open Targets module — the target space DeCure's AI scientist screens approved drugs against.
DeCure.ai methodSignature reversal (LINCS) plus network proximity (STRING) rank already-approved drugs likely to perturb this module — the same engine that produces DeCure.ai's repurposing hypotheses.
Repurposing thesisScreening approved medicines against this disease module, then publishing the evidence for the strongest candidate. Known pharmacology and human exposure data make the first question sharper — they do not establish safety or efficacy in a new indication.
Research record
01
ResearchComing soon
Candidate research + dossier — target rationale, drug-repurposing thesis and evidence pack.proof: Published dossier + on-chain hash
02
ValidationComing soon
In-vitro biological validation at a contract research org (CRO).proof: CRO contract + in-vitro report
03
Peer review & paperComing soon
Peer-reviewed paper published open-access (preprint + journal).proof: DOI + open-access link + on-chain hash
Current lead
No approved-drug candidate for spermatogenic failure 83 is corroborated in the literature DeepSearch retrieved. Some conditions are managed with non-pharmacological care — a device, surgery or physical therapy — rather than a medicine; that may be the case here, or the literature we found may simply be too sparse yet to support a drug-repurposing angle.
What the evidence adds up to
No drug has been shown to consistently improve spermatogenic failure. A 2011 review states that medical treatment of men with primary spermatogenic failure remains largely ineffective, and that while some studies have shown benefit from certain agents—ranging from hormones to nutritional antioxidants—no treatment has demonstrated consistent efficacy. The review notes that idiopathic spermatogenic failure probably results from multiple, as yet unidentified, defects in sperm production, and that empiric medical therapy has been largely replaced by assisted reproductive techniques.
A 1988 study of 8879 vasectomies performed by one surgeon found 97 failures of all types, including 32 early overt failures (0.60%) and 61 technical failures (1.14%) involving persistence of small numbers of spermatozoa. Four late overt failures (0.08%) were discovered only after a pregnancy occurred, each at least four years after two azoospermic test results. Four failures were due to missed vasa deferentia; the rest were attributed to recanalisation.
A 2013 conference abstract describes a method for array comparative genomic hybridisation on single human sperm. The authors state the study was designed to optimise the protocol, not to determine the percentage of chromosomal alterations in normal or pathological conditions. They suggest future application might give information on sperm chromosome aberrations in infertile men, but no results from such application are reported.
What is still missing is a clear understanding of the discrete molecular defects that cause idiopathic spermatogenic failure, which would allow patient stratification and targeted drug testing. No adequately powered, placebo-controlled trial of any drug for this condition has shown reproducible benefit. Funding for such trials and for the basic biology needed to define patient subgroups remains insufficient.
Evidence
Retrieved by DeepSearch across 234,678,978 indexed works and resolved on OpenAlex — ranked by citations, including the results that did not work.
Asian Journal of Andrology · 2011 · 57 citations · open access
Medical therapy for spermatogenic failure
AbstractMedical treatment of men with primary spermatogenic failure remains largely ineffective in contrast to those with secondary testicular failure. Treatment has been attempted with a multitude of agents ranging from hormones to nutritional supplements (antioxidants). While some studies have demonstrated benefit to some treatments, no treatments have consistently demonstrated efficacy nor has it been possible to reliably identify patients likely to benefit. Idiopathic spermatogenic failure likely results from multiple discrete defects in sperm production that are as yet unidentified. A better understanding of these defects will yield more effective treatment options and appropriate triage of patients to specific therapeutic regimens. This review focuses on the rationale and current evidence for hormonal and antioxidant therapy in medical treatment of male infertility, spermatogenic failure in particular. Although empiric medical therapy for spermatogenic failure has been largely replaced by assisted reproductive techniques, both treatment modalities could play a role, perhaps as combination therapy.
The lurking sperm. A review of failures in 8879 vasectomies performed by one physician
AbstractVasectomy techniques and failure rates vary among surgeons, and the criteria for failure are not often clearly defined. To help establish a yardstick for comparative purposes, a series of 8879 consecutive vasectomies performed with uniform technique over 24 years was reviewed. A subgroup of 5331 men who had returned for at least two postoperative semen tests--the study group--was used for follow-up analysis. Failures were defined as early or late and also were categorized as overt or technical according to the numbers, motility, or persistence of the remaining spermatozoa. There were 97 failures of all types, including 32 (0.60%) early and overt failures and 61 (1.14%) technical failures that involved the persistence of small numbers of spermatozoa, possibly of no significance. Four (0.08%) late overt failures were also seen; each of these was discovered as a result of a pregnancy, and each occurred at least four years after two azoospermic test results. Of the 97 failures, four were recognized as due to missed vasa deferentia, and the remainder were attributed to recanalization. Whether improved and reproducible failure rates can be consistently obtained by other techniques is not yet clear.
Human Reproduction · 2013 · 0 citations · open access
Session 69: Clinical endocrinology
AbstractLimitations, reason for caution: This study was mainly performed to optimize an aCGH protocol on human single sperm, not to have percentage of alterations in normal and pathological conditions. Wider implications of the findings: Future application of this method might give important information on the biology and pathophysiology of spermatogenesis and sperm chromosome aberrations in normal subjects and in patients at higher risk of producing unbalanced sperm, such as infertile men, carriers of karyotype anomalies, men with advanced age, subjects treated with chemotherapy, and partners of couples with repeated miscarriage and repeated failure during assisted reproduction techniques. Study funding/competing interest(s): University of Padova/no competing interests
Disease module: DeepOracle (Open Targets). Structures: RDKit from PubChem SMILES. Literature: retrieved by DeepSearch across 234,678,978 indexed works (targeted per-candidate search), resolved on OpenAlex.
DeCure is a research and publication project, not medical advice and not a treatment. "DeCure for X" describes a research goal, not a claim that a cure exists. Backing a cure is a contribution to fund the research — it is not an investment, and confers no yield, royalty, equity or IP ownership. Papers are published open-access by the DeCure.ai DAO.
