DeCure for Spastic paraplegia 86, autosomal recessive
DeCure's autonomous Rare AI scientist is researching a drug-repurposing hypothesis for spastic paraplegia 86, autosomal recessive — screening already-approved drugs against its 1-gene Open Targets disease module to publish open-access research. Research is fast; the path to publication is funded in milestone stages.
Disease moduleSpastic paraplegia 86, autosomal recessive maps to a 1-gene Open Targets module — the target space DeCure's AI scientist screens approved drugs against.
DeCure.ai methodSignature reversal (LINCS) plus network proximity (STRING) rank already-approved drugs likely to perturb this module — the same engine that produces DeCure.ai's repurposing hypotheses.
Repurposing thesisScreening approved medicines against this disease module, then publishing the evidence for the strongest candidate. Known pharmacology and human exposure data make the first question sharper — they do not establish safety or efficacy in a new indication.
Research record
01
ResearchComing soon
Candidate research + dossier — target rationale, drug-repurposing thesis and evidence pack.proof: Published dossier + on-chain hash
02
ValidationComing soon
In-vitro biological validation at a contract research org (CRO).proof: CRO contract + in-vitro report
03
Peer review & paperComing soon
Peer-reviewed paper published open-access (preprint + journal).proof: DOI + open-access link + on-chain hash
Current lead
No approved-drug candidate for spastic paraplegia 86, autosomal recessive is corroborated in the literature DeepSearch retrieved. Some conditions are managed with non-pharmacological care — a device, surgery or physical therapy — rather than a medicine; that may be the case here, or the literature we found may simply be too sparse yet to support a drug-repurposing angle.
What the evidence adds up to
The abstracts provided do not concern spastic paraplegia 86, autosomal recessive, and none of them report any drug treatment, trial, or therapeutic intervention. They describe genetic findings in other forms of hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP). One 2020 study identified compound heterozygous variants in FA2H, SPG11, and SPG7 genes in three pedigrees, diagnosing autosomal recessive HSP types 35, 11, and 7 respectively; all variants were predicted likely pathogenic, and six were previously unreported. The other abstracts cover autosomal dominant HSP: a 2006 study found SPG3A mutations in seven of 106 families, with SPG3A twice as frequent as SPG4 in onset before age 10 (31.8%), and pure HSP with longer disease duration leading to greater handicap; a 2000 report described a novel SPG4 splice-site mutation with marked intrafamilial variability from congenital severity to mild onset after 55; a 1999 study of one large kindred found onset ages consistent with anticipation, suggesting dynamic mutation.
No efficacy data, response rates, survival figures, or sample sizes relevant to drug repurposing appear in these abstracts. There is no mention of any compound, biologic, or candidate therapy for spastic paraplegia 86 or any HSP subtype. The clinical information is limited to genetic diagnosis and natural history, with no outcome measures that could support a therapeutic hypothesis.
What is missing is any clinical or preclinical evidence linking a specific drug to SPG86 pathology, any patient cohort with confirmed SPG86 mutations, and any trial design or outcome measure for this ultra-rare condition. Without genetic confirmation of SPG86 cases, a defined molecular target, and funding for natural-history studies, no repurposing candidate can be evaluated. The abstracts also show that HSP subtypes vary widely in onset and severity even within families, so any future trial would need careful stratification by genotype and phenotype.
Evidence
Retrieved by DeepSearch across 234,678,978 indexed works and resolved on OpenAlex — ranked by citations, including the results that did not work.
Neurology · 2006 · 119 citations
SPG3A is the most frequent cause of hereditary spastic paraplegia with onset before age 10 years
AbstractSeven families with six different SPG3A mutations were identified among 106 with autosomal dominant hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP). Two mutations were novel (T162P, C375R). SPG3A was twice as frequent as SPG4 in patients with onset before age 10 years (31.8%). Later onset was not observed. The phenotype was pure HSP, but disease duration was longer than in non-SPG3A/SPG4 patients, leading ultimately to greater handicap.
Intrafamilial variability in hereditary spastic paraplegia associated with an <i>SPG4</i> gene mutation
AbstractThe authors studied a family with pure autosomal dominant spastic paraplegia (ADHSP) that showed a marked intrafamilial variability in both age at onset and clinical severity, ranging from severe congenital presentation to mild involvement after age 55. They found a novel mutation in the SPG4 gene, which segregates with the disease in six patients. The mutation affects the consensus donor splice site of SPG4 intron 16, resulting in a premature termination codon at amino acid 578. The data confirm the pathologic significance of SPG4 mutations in pure ADHSP and add to the list of known SPG4 allelic variants.
American Journal of Medical Genetics · 1999 · 8 citations
Genetic anticipation in a large family with pure autosomal dominant hereditary spastic paraplegia
AbstractWe have reinvestigated a large kindred identified over 25 years ago segregating for a form of pure autosomal dominant hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP). We have examined additional relatives in order to refine the clinical and genetic characteristics of this disorder, and performed an analysis to determine if anticipation is present in this family. Analysis of onset ages in parent-to-child transmissions of HSP is consistent with anticipation. These results provide support for dynamic mutation as the underlying mechanism of this form of HSP, and suggest a trinucleotide repeat instability occurring primarily in the female germ line.
[Clinical characteristics and variant analysis of five pedigrees with hereditary spastic paraplegia].
AbstractOBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical and genetic characteristics of five pedigrees affected with hereditary spastic paraplegia(HSP). METHODS: Clinical data of the five pedigrees was collected, and high-throughput sequencing was carried out to detect potential variants. Sanger sequencing were used to verify the results. RESULTS: The probands of pedigree 1 and 2 were found to harbor heterozygous SPAST gene variants, namely c.1196C>T and c.1523T>A. The proband of pedigree 3 harbored compound heterozygous variants of FA2H gene (c.61G>C and c.688G>A). Proband from pedigree 4 harbored compound heterozygous variants of SPG11 gene (c.6812+4_6812+7delAGTA and c.915delT). The proband of pedigree 5 harbored compound heterozygous variants of SPG7 gene (c.1703_1704delAG and c.1937-1G>C). Based on the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics(ACMG) guidelines, all variants were predicted to be likely pathogenic. Among these, SPAST gene c.1523T>A, FA2H gene c.61.G>C, SPG11 gene splicing region c.6812+4_6812+7delAGTA, c.915delT, SPG7 gene c.1703_1704delAG and splicing region c.1937-1G>C variants were unreported previously. CONCLUSION: The probands of pedigrees 1 and 2 were diagnosed with autosomal dominant hereditary spastic paraplegia type 4, for which pedigree 2 showed incompletely penetrance. Pedigrees 3, 4, and 5 were diagnosed with autosomal recessive hereditary spastic paraplegia type 35, 11 and 7, respectively. Above result provided a reference for clinical diagnosis and genetic counseling for the affected pedigrees.
Disease module: DeepOracle (Open Targets). Structures: RDKit from PubChem SMILES. Literature: retrieved by DeepSearch across 234,678,978 indexed works (targeted per-candidate search), resolved on OpenAlex.
DeCure is a research and publication project, not medical advice and not a treatment. "DeCure for X" describes a research goal, not a claim that a cure exists. Backing a cure is a contribution to fund the research — it is not an investment, and confers no yield, royalty, equity or IP ownership. Papers are published open-access by the DeCure.ai DAO.
