DeCure's autonomous Metabolic AI scientist is researching a drug-repurposing hypothesis for secondary hyperparathyroidism — screening already-approved drugs against its 3-gene Open Targets disease module to publish open-access research. Research is fast; the path to publication is funded in milestone stages.
Disease moduleSecondary hyperparathyroidism maps to a 3-gene Open Targets module — the target space DeCure's AI scientist screens approved drugs against.
DeCure.ai methodSignature reversal (LINCS) plus network proximity (STRING) rank already-approved drugs likely to perturb this module — the same engine that produces DeCure.ai's repurposing hypotheses.
Repurposing thesisScreening approved medicines against this disease module, then publishing the evidence for the strongest candidate. Known pharmacology and human exposure data make the first question sharper — they do not establish safety or efficacy in a new indication.
Research record
01
ResearchComing soon
Candidate research + dossier — target rationale, drug-repurposing thesis and evidence pack.proof: Published dossier + on-chain hash
02
ValidationComing soon
In-vitro biological validation at a contract research org (CRO).proof: CRO contract + in-vitro report
03
Peer review & paperComing soon
Peer-reviewed paper published open-access (preprint + journal).proof: DOI + open-access link + on-chain hash
Current lead
approvedAlfacalcidolVitamin D receptor agonistapprovedParicalcitolApproved drugapprovedCinacalcetApproved drug
Structures already discussed alongside secondary hyperparathyroidism in the retrieved literature, rendered from public PubChem SMILES. Which drugs appear here reflects the evidence found, not a ranked prediction.
Molecular view
Crystal structure of CYP124 — Alfacalcidol has a real, experimentally solved structure in complex with this target (PDB 6T0H, 1.18 Å). This is the drug's own deposited structure, not a prediction, and confirms it is a structurally characterised molecule rather than an untested guess.
Loading structure…
helix sheet m9bdrag to rotate · scroll to zoom
RCSB Protein Data Bank · entry 6T0H · 1.18 Å · ligand Alfacalcidol (M9B). Experimental structure, not a prediction.
Evidence
Retrieved by DeepSearch across 234,678,978 indexed works and resolved on OpenAlex — ranked by citations, including the results that did not work.
Current Opinion in Nephrology & Hypertension · 2013 · 15 citations · open access
What have we learned about chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorder from the EVOLVE and PRIMO trials?
AbstractPURPOSE OF REVIEW: The treatment of chronic kidney disease-mineral bone disorder (CKD-MBD) has traditionally focused on improvement in biochemical parameters of the disease. However, studies evaluating hard clinical end points or surrogate end points are limited. RECENT FINDINGS: Two randomized controlled trials have recently been published. In the EVOLVE study (Evaluation of Cinacalcet Hydrochloride Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events), cinacalcet was compared with placebo in 3883 haemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism. The primary end point (death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, heart failure or peripheral vascular disease) in an unadjusted intention-to-treat analysis was not significant [hazard ratio 0.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85-1.02, P=0.11]. However, the pre-specified secondary end points of an adjusted intention-to-treat analysis (hazard ratio 0.88; 95% CI 0.79-0.97, P=0.008) were significant. In the PRIMO (Paricalcitol Capsule Benefits in Renal Failure Induced Cardiac Morbidity) trial, 227 patients with CKD stage 3-4 and left ventricular hypertrophy by echocardiography were randomized to paricalcitol or placebo. The primary end point of change in left ventricular mass index by MRI after 12 months was not different between the two groups, but the prespecified end point of cardiovascular-related hospitalizations was reduced in the paricalcitol-treated group (P=0.04). SUMMARY: The results of these two randomized controlled trials have negative primary end points but significant secondary end points and thus require physicians to individualize therapies for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism.
Comparisons Between Oral Pulse Alfacalcidol Therapy and Daily Therapy in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients with Secondary Hyperparathyroidism: A Randomized, Controlled, and Multicenter Study
AbstractOBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of 1alpha-(OH)-D3 high-dose pulse therapy or daily low-dose therapy in secondary hyperthyroidism in maintenance hemodialysis patients in China. METHODS: Maintenance hemodialysis patients of both gender with intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) level above 200 pg/mL were randomly divided into a pulse group and a daily group. They were treated for 20 weeks, with 2 microg oral Alfacalcidol twice weekly or thrice weekly in the pulse group, and 0.5 microg oral Alfacalcidol per day in the daily group. The therapeutic end point was parathyroid hormone level < 200 pg/ mL. The iPTH levels during the study were monitored, and parameters representative of calcium and phosphate metabolism and side effects were also observed. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-eight patients were initially enrolled, 91 in the pulse therapy group and 67 in the daily therapy group. There was no significant difference in age, hemodialysis duration, proportion of diabetic nephropathy and systemic diseases, proportion of patients who had received active vitamin D therapy previously, mean initial iPTH level (pulse group 570.47 +/- 295.86 pg/mL; daily group 498.33 +/- 207.84 pg/mL), serum calcium, serum phosphate, alkaline phosphatase (AKP), and albumin between two groups. In the pulse therapy group there were more patients with iPTH levels of 500 to approximately 1,000 pg/mL and > 1,000 pg/mL, so stratified analysis according to iPTH level was used. In therapeutic end point, iPTH levels in both groups were significantly lower compared with those before therapy (pulse group 261.29 +/- 234.97 pg/mL, P < .01; daily group 262.17 +/- 274.82 pg/mL, P < .01). After 4 weeks, the ratio of reaching end point in the pulse group was 35.2%, which was significantly higher than that (19.4%) in the daily group (P < .05). More obvious change was seen in the 200 to approximately 500 pg/mL subgroup by stratified analysis (P < .05), whereas there was no significant difference between the 500 to approximately 1,000 pg/mL and > 1,000 pg/mL subgroup (P > .05). At therapeutic end point, the total ratio of reaching end point did not differ between the two groups, and there were no obvious differences between each subgroup. In the iPTH 200 to approximately 500 pg/mL subgroup, mean iPTH%/week in the pulse group was significantly higher than that in the daily group, and no obvious difference was seen in other subgroups. AKP levels decreased significantly in both groups at therapeutic end point (pulse group 98.42 +/- 54.52 vs. 74.21 +/- 30.68 IU/L, P < .01; daily group 103.3 +/- 68.04 vs. 75.40 +/- 34.12 IU/L, P < .01). On the 4th week, AKP level in pulse group (82.39 +/- 35.23 IU/L) was significantly lower than the initial level (98.42 +/- 54.52 IU/L, P < .05), whereas in the daily group there was no difference between each week. The mean serum calcium, phosphate, and [Ca2+] x [P3+] levels in both groups did not change greatly. Nine patients in the pulse group (9.9%) and 8 patients in the daily group (11.9%) suffered hypercalcemia at least once. Persistent hypercalcemia occurred in 8 patients in the pulse group (8.8%) and 9 patients in the daily group (13.4%), but the difference in proportion did not show statistical significance. The serum phosphate in the daily group was higher after the therapy (1.74 +/- 0.36 vs. 1.89 +/- 0.36 mmol/L, P < .05), whereas that in the pulse group remained unchanged. At therapeutic end point, [Ca2+] x [P3+] level in the daily group was higher than that before the therapy (48.04 +/- 11.71 vs. 55.46 +/- 12.66, P < .05), whereas in the pulse group there was no significant difference. Side effects for both groups were minimal and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Alfacalcidol [1alpha-(OH)-D3] has good and safe effects on secondary hyperparathyroidism in maintenance hemodialysis patients. The efficacy and early effects of pulse therapy are superior to those of daily therapy in moderate hyperparathyroidism patients.
Disease module: DeepOracle (Open Targets). Structures: RDKit from PubChem SMILES. Literature: retrieved by DeepSearch across 234,678,978 indexed works (targeted per-candidate search), resolved on OpenAlex.
DeCure is a research and publication project, not medical advice and not a treatment. "DeCure for X" describes a research goal, not a claim that a cure exists. Backing a cure is a contribution to fund the research — it is not an investment, and confers no yield, royalty, equity or IP ownership. Papers are published open-access by the DeCure.ai DAO.
