DeCure's autonomous Rare AI scientist is researching a drug-repurposing hypothesis for protein S deficiency — screening already-approved drugs against its 1-gene Open Targets disease module to publish open-access research. Research is fast; the path to publication is funded in milestone stages.
Disease moduleProtein S deficiency maps to a 1-gene Open Targets module — the target space DeCure's AI scientist screens approved drugs against.
DeCure.ai methodSignature reversal (LINCS) plus network proximity (STRING) rank already-approved drugs likely to perturb this module — the same engine that produces DeCure.ai's repurposing hypotheses.
Repurposing thesisScreening approved medicines against this disease module, then publishing the evidence for the strongest candidate. Known pharmacology and human exposure data make the first question sharper — they do not establish safety or efficacy in a new indication.
Research record
01
ResearchComing soon
Candidate research + dossier — target rationale, drug-repurposing thesis and evidence pack.proof: Published dossier + on-chain hash
02
ValidationComing soon
In-vitro biological validation at a contract research org (CRO).proof: CRO contract + in-vitro report
03
Peer review & paperComing soon
Peer-reviewed paper published open-access (preprint + journal).proof: DOI + open-access link + on-chain hash
Current lead
No approved-drug candidate for protein s deficiency is corroborated in the literature DeepSearch retrieved. Some conditions are managed with non-pharmacological care — a device, surgery or physical therapy — rather than a medicine; that may be the case here, or the literature we found may simply be too sparse yet to support a drug-repurposing angle.
Evidence
Retrieved by DeepSearch across 234,678,978 indexed works and resolved on OpenAlex — ranked by citations, including the results that did not work.
Blood · 1995 · 168 citations · open access
Evaluation of the relationship between protein S and C4b-binding protein isoforms in hereditary protein S deficiency demonstrating type I and type III deficiencies to be phenotypic variants of the same genetic disease
AbstractType III protein S deficiency is characterized by a low plasma level of free protein S, whereas the total concentration of protein S is normal. In contrast, both free and total protein S levels are low in type I deficiency. To elucidate the molecular mechanism behind the selective deficiency of free protein S in type III deficiency, the relationship between the plasma concentrations of beta-chain containing isoforms of C4b-binding protein (C4BP beta+) and different forms of protein S (free, bound, and total) was evaluated in 327 members of 18 protein S-deficient families. In normal relatives (n = 190), protein S correlated well with C4BP beta+, with free protein S (96 +/- 23 nmol/L) being equal to the molar excess of protein S (355 +/- 65 nmol/L) over C4BP beta+ (275 +/- 47 nmol/L). In protein S-deficient family members (n = 117), the equimolar relationship between protein S (215 +/- 50 nmol/L) and C4BP beta+ (228 +/- 51 nmol/L), together with the high affinity of the interaction, resulted in low levels of free protein S (16 +/- 10 nmol/L). Free protein S levels were distinctly low in protein S-deficient members, whereas in 47 of the protein S-deficient individuals, the concentration of total protein S was within the normal range, which fulfils the criteria for type III deficiency. The remaining 70 had low levels of both total and free protein S and, accordingly, would be type I deficient. Coexistence of type I and type III deficiency was found in 14 families, suggesting the two types of protein S deficiency to be phenotypic variants of the same genetic disease. Interestingly, not only protein S but also C4BP beta+ levels were decreased in orally anticoagulated controls and even more so in anticoagulated protein S-deficient members, suggesting that the concentration of C4BP beta+ is influenced by that of protein S. In conclusion, our results indicate that type I and type III deficiencies are phenotypic variants of the same genetic disease and that the low plasma concentrations of free protein S in both types are the result of an equimolar relationship between protein S and C4BP beta+.
Protein S Tokushima: abnormal molecule with a substitution of Glu for Lys-155 in the second epidermal growth factor-like domain of protein S
AbstractA 29-year-old female patient with heterozygous congenital protein S deficiency suffering from thrombotic disease had normal levels of both total and free protein S antigen (70% and 65%, respectively), but low cofactor activity (31%) for activated protein C, indicating that she had a variant of protein S, protein S Tokushima. Western blotting using the polyclonal anti-protein S antibody showed that approximately half of the patient's protein S appeared to be the variant with a higher molecular weight than normal protein S. The partially purified variant protein S bound neither to the monoclonal antibody recognizing calcium-dependent conformation of protein S nor to the antibody recognizing the thrombin-sensitive domain of protein S. Among the exons from II to XV of the patient's protein S gene encoding from the NH2-terminal end to the COOH-terminal end of protein S, only one missense mutation (A to G) was found in exon VI of the protein S alpha-gene, which results in amino acid substitution of Glu(GAG) for Lys-155(AAG) in the second epidermal growth factor-like domain of protein S. The recombinant protein S Tokushima expressed in BHK cells had a slightly higher molecular weight than the recombinant normal one, did not bind to the antibody specific for the thrombin-sensitive domain, and did not show the cofactor activity. These findings suggest that the protein S Tokushima molecule is structurally and functionally a variant of protein S, and that this variant protein S is the cause of severe thrombosis in this patient.
Disease module: DeepOracle (Open Targets). Structures: RDKit from PubChem SMILES. Literature: retrieved by DeepSearch across 234,678,978 indexed works (targeted per-candidate search), resolved on OpenAlex.
DeCure is a research and publication project, not medical advice and not a treatment. "DeCure for X" describes a research goal, not a claim that a cure exists. Backing a cure is a contribution to fund the research — it is not an investment, and confers no yield, royalty, equity or IP ownership. Papers are published open-access by the DeCure.ai DAO.
