DeCure's autonomous Cancer AI scientist is researching a drug-repurposing hypothesis for neuroendocrine carcinoma — screening already-approved drugs against its 47-gene Open Targets disease module to publish open-access research. Research is fast; the path to publication is funded in milestone stages.
Disease moduleNeuroendocrine carcinoma maps to a 47-gene Open Targets module — the target space DeCure's AI scientist screens approved drugs against.
DeCure.ai methodSignature reversal (LINCS) plus network proximity (STRING) rank already-approved drugs likely to perturb this module — the same engine that produces DeCure.ai's repurposing hypotheses.
Repurposing thesisScreening approved medicines against this disease module, then publishing the evidence for the strongest candidate. Known pharmacology and human exposure data make the first question sharper — they do not establish safety or efficacy in a new indication.
Research record
01
ResearchComing soon
Candidate research + dossier — target rationale, drug-repurposing thesis and evidence pack.proof: Published dossier + on-chain hash
02
ValidationComing soon
In-vitro biological validation at a contract research org (CRO).proof: CRO contract + in-vitro report
03
Peer review & paperComing soon
Peer-reviewed paper published open-access (preprint + journal).proof: DOI + open-access link + on-chain hash
Current lead
No approved-drug candidate for neuroendocrine carcinoma is corroborated in the literature DeepSearch retrieved. Some conditions are managed with non-pharmacological care — a device, surgery or physical therapy — rather than a medicine; that may be the case here, or the literature we found may simply be too sparse yet to support a drug-repurposing angle.
Molecular view
kinase insert domain receptor (KDR) — KDR is one of the genes genetically linked to this disease in Open Targets — shown as context, not as a drug target we're pursuing: no approved-drug candidate for this disease is yet corroborated in the literature we found.
Loading structure…
helix sheet ethylsulfonyldrag to rotate · scroll to zoom
RCSB Protein Data Bank · entry 1Y6A · 2.1 Å · ligand N-[5-(ETHYLSULFONYL)-2-METHOXYPHENYL]-5-[3-(2-PYRIDINYL)PHENYL]-1,3-OXAZOL-2-AMINE (AAZ). Experimental structure, not a prediction.
Evidence
Retrieved by DeepSearch across 234,678,978 indexed works and resolved on OpenAlex — ranked by citations, including the results that did not work.
Neuroendocrine Renal Carcinoma – Therapeutic and Diagnostic Issues
AbstractINTRODUCTION: Neuroendocrine renal carcinoma represents less than 1% of all primary neoplasia of the kidney. Most frequently poorly differentiated carcinoma is diagnosed in advanced stages and they have an aggressive evolution and limited survival rate. Neuroendocrine carcinomas that arise from the renal pelvis are frequently associated with squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We present the case of a female patient, known for 3 years before with an undefined retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis, being diagnosed at present with a left large cell neuroendocrine renal carcinoma, who initially had lymph node metastasis. RESULTS: Until now, 118 cases of primary neuroendocrine renal carcinomas have been reported. A limited number of poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas have been reported. DISCUSSION: Due to the clinical and biological findings, the aggressive evolution with early metastasis of lung and bone, the patient is included in the group of poorly differentiated carcinomas. In these cases, multimodal treatment is a gold standard. After surgical treatment and palliative chemotherapy with platinum salts, we obtained a partial remission of the disease and the control of symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Regarding large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma, the surgical treatment remains the treatment of choice. Chemotherapy can determine limited results, improve the quality of life and enhance the overall survival rate.
Research Square · 2022 · 1 citations · open access
Clinicopathological Characteristics of Extrahepatic Biliary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms in the Gallbladder, Extrahepatic Biliary Tract, and Ampulla of Vater: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study
AbstractAbstract Background Significant changes were made in the grading and staging systems for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) in 2017. Therefore, a clinical report to comprehensively update the clinicopathological characteristics, therapeutic approaches, and prognosis of these patients should be drafted. Methods We retrospectively reviewed a database of 16 patients who developed NENs or mixed endocrine non-endocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) after curative resection. Among them, eight had ampulla of Vater (AoV) tumors, and eight had non-AoV tumors. One patient had NEN Grade 1, five had NEN Grade 2, and five had NEN Grade 3 (G3); all had poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. Five patients had MiNEN or combined carcinoma. Results The mean age was 57.88 years. The overall survival rates after curative surgery at 1, 3, and 5 years were 87.1, 80.4, and 71.4%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 87.1%, 79.8%, and 71.8%, respectively. In univariate analysis, age >65 years, mitotic count (>20/10 high-power fields), Ki-67 index >20%, and presence of stones were significant prognosticators, whereas only the mitotic count was statistically significant in the multivariate analysis. Age >65 years (p=0.039), a Ki-67 index >20% (p=0.03), presence of stones (p=0.021), G3 stage disease, MiNEN (p=0.002), or perineural invasion (p<0.001) were more frequently observed in the non-AoV group than in the AoV group. Conclusion High mitosis count had a greater effect on extrahepatic biliary NEN than the tumor-node-metastasis staging system. Patients with AoV tumors had better prognostic predictor factors compared to those with non-AoV tumors.
Disease module: DeepOracle (Open Targets). Structures: RDKit from PubChem SMILES. Literature: retrieved by DeepSearch across 234,678,978 indexed works (targeted per-candidate search), resolved on OpenAlex.
DeCure is a research and publication project, not medical advice and not a treatment. "DeCure for X" describes a research goal, not a claim that a cure exists. Backing a cure is a contribution to fund the research — it is not an investment, and confers no yield, royalty, equity or IP ownership. Papers are published open-access by the DeCure.ai DAO.
