DeCure's autonomous Rare AI scientist is researching a drug-repurposing hypothesis for hearing loss, autosomal dominant 85 — screening already-approved drugs against its 1-gene Open Targets disease module to publish open-access research. Research is fast; the path to publication is funded in milestone stages.
Disease moduleHearing loss, autosomal dominant 85 maps to a 1-gene Open Targets module — the target space DeCure's AI scientist screens approved drugs against.
DeCure.ai methodSignature reversal (LINCS) plus network proximity (STRING) rank already-approved drugs likely to perturb this module — the same engine that produces DeCure.ai's repurposing hypotheses.
Repurposing thesisScreening approved medicines against this disease module, then publishing the evidence for the strongest candidate. Known pharmacology and human exposure data make the first question sharper — they do not establish safety or efficacy in a new indication.
Research record
01
ResearchComing soon
Candidate research + dossier — target rationale, drug-repurposing thesis and evidence pack.proof: Published dossier + on-chain hash
02
ValidationComing soon
In-vitro biological validation at a contract research org (CRO).proof: CRO contract + in-vitro report
03
Peer review & paperComing soon
Peer-reviewed paper published open-access (preprint + journal).proof: DOI + open-access link + on-chain hash
Current lead
No approved-drug candidate for hearing loss, autosomal dominant 85 is corroborated in the literature DeepSearch retrieved. Some conditions are managed with non-pharmacological care — a device, surgery or physical therapy — rather than a medicine; that may be the case here, or the literature we found may simply be too sparse yet to support a drug-repurposing angle.
What the evidence adds up to
An estimated 6.7% of a UK clinical population and 0.7% of the general population have hearing loss greater than 70 dB averaged over 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz, based on a retrospective study of 32,781 cases from which 2,199 cases of severe or profound loss were identified and a stratified sample of 302 adults was contacted. Most patients in that sample used bilateral hearing aids with a non-linear prescription and reported high social support. A separate clinical genetic study of 144 patients with nonsyndromic hearing loss examined sex distribution, type, degree, symmetry, laterality, progression, aetiology, and inheritance pattern, but no specific gene or drug was reported.
A 2025 collection of 31 papers on hearing loss notes that genetic factors account for roughly 50% of congenital cases and that research spans basic mechanisms, protection methods, gene therapy, and clinical applications. No drug treatment for autosomal dominant hearing loss 85 is described in any of these papers. An observational study of 1,651 patients aged 18 to 99 found that patients taking drugs, whether single or multiple, reported higher hearing deficits than those not taking drugs, with a dose-response pattern: the risk of moderate to severe impairment increased with the number of drugs taken. Drugs for cardiovascular disease and acid-related disorders were linked to increased perceived hearing impairment, while antidiabetic agents were associated with a potential protective effect. The cross-sectional design precludes any inference of causality.
No drug is mentioned in these abstracts that has been tested specifically for autosomal dominant hearing loss 85. What is missing is any trial of a repurposed drug for this particular genetic form of hearing loss, any patient stratification by genotype, and any funding for such a trial. The observational data on polypharmacy cannot guide treatment for a monogenic condition, and the genetic studies cited do not identify a drug target.
Evidence
Retrieved by DeepSearch across 234,678,978 indexed works and resolved on OpenAlex — ranked by citations, including the results that did not work.
International Journal of Audiology · 2012 · 32 citations
Prevalence & characteristics of severe and profound hearing loss in adults in a UK National Health Service clinic
AbstractLaura Turton*ab & Pauline Smithcda Hearing Link, Eastbourne, UKb The Centre for Hearing & Balance Disorders, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UKc Hearing Services Department, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, UKd Medical Research Council Hearing and Communication Group, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UKCorrespondence: Laura Turton, Hearing Link, 27–28, The Waterfront, Eastbourne, East Sussex, BN23 5UZ, UK. E-mail:[email protected]: To estimate the prevalence of severe and profound hearing loss in a clinical population and to report the audiological and hearing-aid characteristics for this group, as well as outcome measures from use of hearing aids. Design: A retrospective observational study initially, followed by a postal Glasgow health status inventory (GHSI) to establish the patients functional outcomes. Study sample: A clinical database of 32 781 cases was interrogated from which 2199 cases of severe /profound hearing loss were identified. From these, an adult sample stratified in terms of age and gender of n = 302 was contacted. Results: An estimated 6.7% of the local clinical population and 0.7% of the general population were found to have hearing > 70 dB averaged over 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz. Most patients were fitted with bilateral hearing aids, using a non-linear prescription, and as a group they reported a high level of social support. Conclusions: This study has estimated the prevalence of severe and profound hearing loss as 6.7% of the clinical population, and 0.7% of the general population. This is consistent with previous work, although it probably underestimates the prevalence. Further work is indicated to strengthen the estimate.
American Journal of Audiology · 2004 · 1 citations
Clinical Genetic Study of 144 Patients With Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss
AbstractHearing loss constitutes an important category of congenital defects that can be isolated or part of the phenotypic spectrum of several syndromes. A clinical genetic study was performed on a sample of 144 patients with nonsyndromic hearing loss, establishing the sex distribution, type, degree, symmetry, laterality, progression, etiology, and, when possible, inheritance pattern.
Advanced Science · 2025 · 1 citations · open access
Hearing Loss: From Basic to Clinical Science
AbstractHearing loss (HL) affects over 1.5 billion people globally, with genetic factors accounting for ≈50% of congenital cases. Therefore, HL has become a global health issue, driving extensive research from basic science to clinical applications. This Special Collection includes a total of 31 papers, among which 9 are review papers, 21 are research article papers, 1 is a perspective paper, that highlight the basic mechanisms and possible protection methods of HL, the application of gene therapy for treating HL, and the clinical study and application in HL.
Audiology Research · 2025 · 0 citations · open access
Association Between Polypharmacy and Self-Reported Hearing Disability: An Observational Study Using ATC Classification and HHIE-S-It Questionnaire
AbstractBACKGROUND: hearing loss represents, today, one of the most significant health problems affecting the world's population. This clinical condition, particularly manifest in adulthood, can arise or be aggravated by both the presence of specific pathologies and by taking multiple classes of drugs at the same time. METHODS: to understand this relationship, the present non-interventional observational study aimed to investigate the relationship between worsening hearing abilities in 1651 patients aged between 18 and 99 years. In particular, the thorough history of patients allowed us to evaluate the pathological profiles, pharmacological profiles, and therapeutic regimens adopted. This allowed us to evaluate its association with self-reported hearing loss, assessed through the administration of the HHIE-S-It questionnaire. Furthermore, given the presence of multimorbidity, the possible correlation between self-reported hearing loss and the specific classes of drugs, categorized using the Anatomical Therapeutic Classification (ATC) system, was evaluated. RESULTS: the results highlighted how patients taking drugs, both in mono- and polytherapy regimens, had higher hearing deficits than patients not taking drugs. Furthermore, an apparent dose-response effect, in which the risk of moderate to severe impairment progressively increased with the number of drugs taken, was also observed. Different classes of drugs, particularly those used for the treatment of diseases of the cardiovascular system, as well as drugs for acid-related disorders, were significantly linked to an increased risk of perceived hearing impairment. On the contrary, agents belonging to the antidiabetic category have proven to be drugs capable of offering a potential protective effect. CONCLUSION: this study highlighted how both the number of drugs taken and some specific categories of drugs can contribute to perceived hearing impairment. While this evidence highlights the importance of integrating audiological evaluation into the management of patients in polypharmacy, the cross-sectional nature of the design precludes the inference of causality. This evidence still favors safer and more personalized therapeutic strategies.
Disease module: DeepOracle (Open Targets). Structures: RDKit from PubChem SMILES. Literature: retrieved by DeepSearch across 234,678,978 indexed works (targeted per-candidate search), resolved on OpenAlex.
DeCure is a research and publication project, not medical advice and not a treatment. "DeCure for X" describes a research goal, not a claim that a cure exists. Backing a cure is a contribution to fund the research — it is not an investment, and confers no yield, royalty, equity or IP ownership. Papers are published open-access by the DeCure.ai DAO.
