Cancer Lab · DeCure for X

DeCure for Female breast carcinoma

DeCure's autonomous Cancer AI scientist is researching a drug-repurposing hypothesis for female breast carcinoma — screening already-approved drugs against its 48-gene Open Targets disease module to publish open-access research. Research is fast; the path to publication is funded in milestone stages.

Disease module48 genesLead labCancer
All cures
CancerDOID:0050671$DeCureCancer

The disease map

Disease moduleFemale breast carcinoma maps to a 48-gene Open Targets module — the target space DeCure's AI scientist screens approved drugs against.
DeCure.ai methodSignature reversal (LINCS) plus network proximity (STRING) rank already-approved drugs likely to perturb this module — the same engine that produces DeCure.ai's repurposing hypotheses.
Repurposing thesisScreening approved medicines against this disease module, then publishing the evidence for the strongest candidate. Known pharmacology and human exposure data make the first question sharper — they do not establish safety or efficacy in a new indication.

Research record

01
ResearchComing soon
Candidate research + dossier — target rationale, drug-repurposing thesis and evidence pack.proof: Published dossier + on-chain hash
02
ValidationComing soon
In-vitro biological validation at a contract research org (CRO).proof: CRO contract + in-vitro report
03
Peer review & paperComing soon
Peer-reviewed paper published open-access (preprint + journal).proof: DOI + open-access link + on-chain hash

Current lead

approved
LevonorgestrelProgesterone receptor agonist

Structures already discussed alongside female breast carcinoma in the retrieved literature, rendered from public PubChem SMILES. Which drugs appear here reflects the evidence found, not a ranked prediction.

Molecular view

CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF THE N-TERMINAL LG-DOMAIN OF SHBGLevonorgestrel has a real, experimentally solved structure in complex with this target (PDB 1LHV, 2.0 Å). This is the drug's own deposited structure, not a prediction, and confirms it is a structurally characterised molecule rather than an untested guess.

Loading structure…
helix sheet nogdrag to rotate · scroll to zoom

RCSB Protein Data Bank · entry 1LHV · 2.0 Å · ligand Levonorgestrel (NOG). Experimental structure, not a prediction.

What the evidence adds up to

A nationwide Finnish cohort study of 93,843 women aged 30–49 who used a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) for menorrhagia between 1994 and 2007 found an increased risk of both ductal and lobular breast cancer compared with the general female population. Over 1,032,767 woman-years of follow-up, 2015 breast cancers were diagnosed. The standardized incidence ratio for ductal cancer was 1.20 (95% CI 1.14–1.25) and for lobular cancer 1.33 (95% CI 1.20–1.46). Among women who purchased the device at least twice, the lobular cancer risk rose to 1.73 (95% CI 1.37–2.15). The authors conclude that intrauterine levonorgestrel is associated with an excess risk of both lobular and ductal breast cancer, contrary to earlier assumptions that only lobular risk was elevated.

In octogenarian women (≥80 years) with early-stage breast cancer (stages I–IIB), a single-centre retrospective study of 259 patients (median age 84) reported that standard surgical treatment was associated with better breast-cancer-specific survival than non-surgical therapy. Among the 189 patients with early-stage disease, mean breast-cancer-specific survival was 108 months (95% CI 101–115) in the surgical group versus 50 months (95% CI 39–61) in the non-surgical group (P < 0.01). For the 70 patients with locally advanced disease (stages IIIA–IIIC), breast-cancer-specific survival did not differ between surgical and non-surgical groups. The study also noted that standard surgical treatment yielded better survival than suboptimal surgery.

A 2024 review article on female breast carcinoma states that the disease is rare in women but carries substantial morbidity and mortality. It notes that female breast cancer differs biologically from male breast cancer, with a higher frequency of oestrogen receptor positivity and more aggressive clinical behaviour in some African regions. The review says the disease responds to chemotherapy and hormonal therapy, but that optimal treatment plans for female patients remain unknown and that most knowledge about its biology and treatment has come from research on its female counterpart.

A phase 1b study (SPI-POZ-101, NCT03429101) is evaluating the combination of poziotinib, an irreversible ErbB receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, with T-DM1 (an HER2 antibody-drug conjugate) in women with advanced or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer who have received at least two prior lines of anti-HER2 therapy. The primary objectives are to determine the maximum tolerated dose or maximum administered dose of daily poziotinib plus T-DM1 every three weeks, and to evaluate objective response rate. Part 1 uses a 3+3 dose-escalation design with up to three dose levels (8, 10, and 12 mg, with possible de-escalation to 6 mg). Part 2 will enrol approximately 10 patients at the MTD/MAD to confirm safety and assess preliminary efficacy. The trial is ongoing; poziotinib is not approved for breast cancer. What remains missing are completed safety and efficacy data from this phase 1b trial, and any larger randomised studies that would be needed to determine whether the combination improves outcomes over existing HER2-directed therapies. No trial has yet addressed whether patient stratification by prior treatment response or biomarker profile could identify those most likely to benefit.

Evidence

Retrieved by DeepSearch across 234,678,978 indexed works and resolved on OpenAlex — ranked by citations, including the results that did not work.

Acta Oncologica · 2015 · 71 citations · open access

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system and the risk of breast cancer: A nationwide cohort study

AbstractBACKGROUND: Prolonged steroid hormone therapy increases the risk of breast cancer, especially the risk of lobular cancer, but the effect of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) use is controversial. In this study we aimed to test the hypothesis that risk for lobular breast cancer is elevated among LNG-IUS users. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We identified from the national Medical Reimbursement Registry of Finland the women aged 30-49 who had used LNG-IUS for the treatment or prevention of menorrhagia in 1994-2007, and from the Finnish Cancer Registry breast cancers diagnosed before the age of 55 and by the end of 2012. RESULTS: A total of 2015 women had breast cancer diagnosed in a cohort of 93 843 LNG-IUS users during follow-up consisting of 1 032 767 women-years. The LNG-IUS users had an increased risk for both ductal breast cancer [standardized incidence ratio (SIR) 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14-1.25] and for lobular breast cancer (SIR 1.33, 95% CI 1.20-1.46), as compared with the general female population. The highest risk was found in LNG-IUS users who purchased the device at least twice, whose SIR for lobular cancer was 1.73 (95% CI 1.37-2.15). CONCLUSIONS: The results imply that intrauterine administration of levonorgestrel is not only related to an excess risk of lobular breast cancer but also, in contrary to previous assumptions, to an excess risk of ductal breast cancer.

https://doi.org/10.3109/0284186x.2015.1062538
International Journal of Surgery · 2013 · 15 citations

Surgery improves breast cancer-specific survival in octogenarians with early-stage breast cancer

AbstractINTRODUCTION: No consensus exists on optimum therapy for older cancer patients. This singlecentre study was conducted to review the treatment and outcomes for octogenarian women treated for breast cancer. METHODS: Data of all elderly breast cancer patients (≥80 years) with primary breast cancer treated at out institution between 1990 and 2009. Patients with carcinoma in-situ (stage 0) and advanced breast cancer (stage IV) were excluded. Breast cancer-specific survival and disease-free survival for the different patient groups were analysed according to the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 259 patients (median age 84 years). There were 189 (73%) patients with early stage disease (I, IIA, IIB) and 70 (27%) with locally advanced disease (IIIA, IIIB, IIIC). A total of 175 (67.7%) patients underwent surgical treatment and 84 (32.4%) received primary endocrine treatment. Patients were followed for a median of 65 months. In patients with early stages, the mean breast cancer-specific survival was 108 months (95% CI 101-115) in the surgical group and 50 months (95% CI 39-61) in the non-surgical group (P < 0.01), whereas patients with locally advanced breast cancer breast cancer-specific survival was similar for the surgical and non-surgical groups. Breast cancer-specific survival and disease-free survival were significantly better among patients who underwent standard surgical treatment than among those with suboptimal surgery. CONCLUSION: In women ≥80 years with early-stage breast cancer, standard surgical treatment as compared with non-surgical therapy was associated with a better breast cancer-specific.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.05.032
International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · 2024 · 9 citations · open access

Review Article on Breast Cancer

AbstractAbstract: However being rare in women, breast cancer can have a substantial morbidity and fatality rate. The goal of the current review is to ascertain whether breast cancer treatment and evaluation methods used on female patients are suitable for this type of cancer. In comparison to male breast cancer, female breast cancer differs biologically in that it is more common in some regions of Africa, has a higher frequency of oestrogen receptor positive, and has more aggressive clinical behavior. It reacts to chemotherapy and hormonal therapy, yet it is unknown what the best treatment plans are for female patients. Breast cancer in women is still a rare condition. The majority of what we currently know about its biology, natural history, and methods of therapy has been derived from research on its female counterpart.

https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2024.58904
Cancer Research · 2019 · 2 citations

Abstract OT2-07-04: A phase 1b study of poziotinib in combination with T-DM1 in women with advanced or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer

AbstractAbstract Background:Poziotinib represents a new class of irreversible quinazoline inhibitors of ErbB receptor tyrosine kinases that inhibit the proliferation of tumor cells in culture and in vivo by inhibiting HER-1 (EGFR), HER-2, HER-4. ErbB signaling plays important roles in the progression of HER2+ breast cancer. Poziotinib has promising clinical activity in breast cancer, and other solid tumors including lung, gastric, and colorectal cancers. Study SPI-POZ-101, is being conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of daily poziotinib and T-DM1, HER2 antibody-drug-conjugate every three weeks in patients with HER2+ advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Trial Objectives and Design: The primary objectives of the study are to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or maximum administered dose (MAD) of daily poziotinib plus T-DM1 (every 3 weeks) in women with advanced or metastatic HER2 positive breast cancer; and to evaluate the Objective Response Rate (ORR) in these patients. The secondary objectives include disease control rate (DCR), progression-free-survival (PFS), safety and pharmacokinetics at the MTD/MAD dose level of poziotinib plus T-DM1. In Part 1, the dose of poziotinib plus standard dose of T-DM1 (3.6 mg/kg IV) on Day 1 of each cycle will be determined using a “3+3” design with up to 3 escalating dose levels, 8, 10 and 12 mg with no DLT or to de-escalate to 6 mg with DLT observed in Cycle 1. Patients in current dose cohort, if not discontinued, will continue treatment until discontinuation of therapy. In Part 2 of the study, approximately 10 patients will be treated at the MTD/MAD to confirm dose for safety of the combination and to evaluate preliminary efficacy. Eligibility Criteria: The study will enroll female patients between 18 and 90 years with confirmed HER2 overexpression or gene-amplified tumor via immunohistochemistry [IHC] with IHC 3+ or IHC 2+ with confirmatory fluorescence in situ hybridization [FISH]+ or [ISH]+ and must have had at least 2 lines of anti-HER2 directed therapies either in the metastatic or early-stage disease setting. Patients must have adequate hematologic, hepatic, cardiac and renal functions and have at least one measurable lesion per RECIST 1.1 criteria. Exclusion criteria includes unstable CNS metastases or seizure disorder; anticancer chemotherapy, TKIs, biologics, immunotherapy, radiotherapy, or investigational treatment within 15 days; ≥ Grade 2 adverse events; known hypersensitivity to receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors or any of the components of poziotinib tablets or T-DM1 IV solution. Statistical Methods: Part 1 of the study will enroll 3 to 6 patients at each dose using 3+3 design. Part 2 will enroll 10 patients at the MTD/MAD. The efficacy analysis will be conducted using the Evaluable Population based on RECIST 1.1. The Clopper-Pearson 95% confidence interval will be estimated using exact method based on binomial distribution. Target Accrual:Part 1: 6-18 patients Part 2: 10 patients ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03429101 Contact Information: Spectrum Pharmaceuticals. [email protected] Poziotinib is currently under clinical investigation and has not been approved for use in breast cancer. Citation Format: Bhat G, Potter D, Bharadwaj J, Khan N, Shabazz L, Tache J, Yang Z. A phase 1b study of poziotinib in combination with T-DM1 in women with advanced or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT2-07-04.

https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-ot2-07-04

Disease module: DeepOracle (Open Targets). Structures: RDKit from PubChem SMILES. Literature: retrieved by DeepSearch across 234,678,978 indexed works (targeted per-candidate search), resolved on OpenAlex.

DeCure is a research and publication project, not medical advice and not a treatment. "DeCure for X" describes a research goal, not a claim that a cure exists. Backing a cure is a contribution to fund the research — it is not an investment, and confers no yield, royalty, equity or IP ownership. Papers are published open-access by the DeCure.ai DAO.