DeCure for Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 63
DeCure's autonomous Rare AI scientist is researching a drug-repurposing hypothesis for autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 63 — screening already-approved drugs against its 2-gene Open Targets disease module to publish open-access research. Research is fast; the path to publication is funded in milestone stages.
Disease moduleAutosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 63 maps to a 2-gene Open Targets module — the target space DeCure's AI scientist screens approved drugs against.
DeCure.ai methodSignature reversal (LINCS) plus network proximity (STRING) rank already-approved drugs likely to perturb this module — the same engine that produces DeCure.ai's repurposing hypotheses.
Repurposing thesisScreening approved medicines against this disease module, then publishing the evidence for the strongest candidate. Known pharmacology and human exposure data make the first question sharper — they do not establish safety or efficacy in a new indication.
Research record
01
ResearchComing soon
Candidate research + dossier — target rationale, drug-repurposing thesis and evidence pack.proof: Published dossier + on-chain hash
02
ValidationComing soon
In-vitro biological validation at a contract research org (CRO).proof: CRO contract + in-vitro report
03
Peer review & paperComing soon
Peer-reviewed paper published open-access (preprint + journal).proof: DOI + open-access link + on-chain hash
Current lead
No approved-drug candidate for autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 63 is corroborated in the literature DeepSearch retrieved. Some conditions are managed with non-pharmacological care — a device, surgery or physical therapy — rather than a medicine; that may be the case here, or the literature we found may simply be too sparse yet to support a drug-repurposing angle.
Molecular view
anaphase promoting complex subunit 15 (ANAPC15) — ANAPC15 is one of the genes genetically linked to this disease in Open Targets — shown as context, not as a drug target we're pursuing: no approved-drug candidate for this disease is yet corroborated in the literature we found.
Loading structure…
helix sheet apo structuredrag to rotate · scroll to zoom
RCSB Protein Data Bank · entry 9GAW · 2.9 Å · ligand none (apo structure). Experimental structure, not a prediction.
What the evidence adds up to
Autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss 63 (DFNB7/11) is caused by biallelic pathogenic variants in the TMC1 gene. A 2004 clinical genetic study of 144 patients with nonsyndromic hearing loss described the general approach to establishing sex distribution, type, degree, symmetry, laterality, progression, aetiology, and inheritance pattern, but did not report specific results for DFNB7/11. A 2000 review noted that at that time only 6 genes had been identified for autosomal recessive hearing loss, with an estimated 50 to 80 hearing loss genes still undiscovered.
A 2020 retrospective analysis from a single Italian otolaryngology clinic identified only 3 patients from 2 non-consanguineous families with DFNB7/11 among a cohort of children with nonsyndromic hearing loss who had undergone cochlear implantation. All three children showed the typical phenotype of prelingual, severe-to-profound bilateral hearing loss. A novel disease-causing TMC1 variant, c.962G>A p.(Trp321*), was detected. After cochlear implantation, the patients showed what the authors describe as an excellent functional outcome, with speech perception, nonverbal cognition, and speech performance comparable to those of patients with DFNB1 deafness.
The authors state that their results do not support the variable auditory outcome reported in the wider literature, which they suggest may be affected by social, environmental, and genetic background factors. The evidence base for DFNB7/11 remains extremely thin: only 3 patients in a single retrospective study, with no controlled comparison and no data on long-term outcomes beyond the immediate post-implantation period. What is still missing are prospective studies with larger, genetically confirmed cohorts, standardised outcome measures, and stratification by age at implantation, type of TMC1 variant, and environmental factors such as language exposure and rehabilitation access. No drug treatment is mentioned in any of these abstracts.
Evidence
Retrieved by DeepSearch across 234,678,978 indexed works and resolved on OpenAlex — ranked by citations, including the results that did not work.
Genetics of pediatric hearing loss: A functional perspective
AbstractOBJECTIVES: This article reviews the current role of genetics in pediatric hearing loss (HL). METHODS: A review of the current literature regarding the genetic basis of HL in children was performed. RESULTS: To date, 119 nonsyndromic genes have been associated with HL. There are also hundreds of syndromic causes that have HL as part of the clinical phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying HL genes coupled with clinical characteristics ("genotype-phenotype") yields a more accurate diagnosis and prognosis. Although the complexity of the auditory apparatus presents challenges, gene therapy is emerging and may be a viable management option in the future.
[Diagnosis and reproductive guidance for a couple carrying a novel c.1893C>T mutation of the TECTA gene].
AbstractOBJECTIVE: To explore the molecular basis for an individual with postnatal deafness and provide genetic counseling for her family. METHODS: Following extraction of genomic DNA from peripheral blood samples, 127 genes associated with deafness were subjected to targeted capturing and next generation sequencing. Suspected mutation was verified by Sanger sequencing. RESULTS: The proband was found to carry a homozygous c.1893C>A mutation in the TECTA gene, which is located in the tectorial membrane of inner ear and may cause premature termination of translation of TECTA protein. In addition, two heterozygous mutations, c.13010C>T and c.12790G>A, were found in the USH2A gene. Whilst the former is likely to be pathogenic, the latter has unknown clinical significance. Further analysis suggested that all three mutations have derived from the parents of the proband. CONCLUSION: The homozygous c.1893C>A mutation of the TECTA gene probably underlies the proband's hearing loss which conformed to an autosomal recessive inheritance.
American Journal of Audiology · 2004 · 1 citations
Clinical Genetic Study of 144 Patients With Nonsyndromic Hearing Loss
AbstractHearing loss constitutes an important category of congenital defects that can be isolated or part of the phenotypic spectrum of several syndromes. A clinical genetic study was performed on a sample of 144 patients with nonsyndromic hearing loss, establishing the sex distribution, type, degree, symmetry, laterality, progression, etiology, and, when possible, inheritance pattern.
Supplementary Material for: Auditory Outcome after Cochlear Implantation in Children with DFNB7/11 Caused by Pathogenic Variants in <b><i>TMC1</i></b> Gene
Abstract<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Non-syndromic hereditary hearing loss is characterized by extreme genetic heterogeneity. So far, more than 100 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in <i>TMC1</i> gene have been reported in patients with autosomal recessive hearing loss (HL) DFNB7/11. The prevailing auditory phenotype of individuals with DFNB7/11 is congenital, profound, bilateral HL, but the functional outcome after cochlear implantation (CI) described in the literature is variable. The objective of this work is to evaluate the auditory outcome after CI in pediatric patients with DFNB7/11, born to non-consanguineous parents. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective analysis of genetic and audiological data of DFNB7/11 patients followed up in a single Italian otolaryngology clinic was performed. Cases with biallelic pathogenic variants in <i>TMC1</i> were selected from the cohort of children with non-syndromic hearing loss who had undergone CI and had been molecularly characterized by multigene panel testing. All patients underwent extensive audiological assessment, and the auditory outcome after CI was evaluated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> DFNB7/11 was diagnosed in a total of 3 patients from 2 non-consanguineous families; a novel disease-causing variant in <i>TMC1</i> was detected [c.962G>A p.(Trp321*)]. All the affected children showed the typical DFNB7/11 phenotype characterized by prelingual, severe-to-profound HL. The patients showed an excellent functional outcome after CI; speech perception, nonverbal cognition, and speech performance were comparable to those of patients with DFNB1 deafness. <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> Our results do not support the variable auditory outcome reported in the literature, which may be affected by several social and environmental factors and by the genetic background.
Supplementary Material for: Auditory Outcome after Cochlear Implantation in Children with DFNB7/11 Caused by Pathogenic Variants in <b><i>TMC1</i></b> Gene
Abstract<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Non-syndromic hereditary hearing loss is characterized by extreme genetic heterogeneity. So far, more than 100 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in <i>TMC1</i> gene have been reported in patients with autosomal recessive hearing loss (HL) DFNB7/11. The prevailing auditory phenotype of individuals with DFNB7/11 is congenital, profound, bilateral HL, but the functional outcome after cochlear implantation (CI) described in the literature is variable. The objective of this work is to evaluate the auditory outcome after CI in pediatric patients with DFNB7/11, born to non-consanguineous parents. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A retrospective analysis of genetic and audiological data of DFNB7/11 patients followed up in a single Italian otolaryngology clinic was performed. Cases with biallelic pathogenic variants in <i>TMC1</i> were selected from the cohort of children with non-syndromic hearing loss who had undergone CI and had been molecularly characterized by multigene panel testing. All patients underwent extensive audiological assessment, and the auditory outcome after CI was evaluated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> DFNB7/11 was diagnosed in a total of 3 patients from 2 non-consanguineous families; a novel disease-causing variant in <i>TMC1</i> was detected [c.962G>A p.(Trp321*)]. All the affected children showed the typical DFNB7/11 phenotype characterized by prelingual, severe-to-profound HL. The patients showed an excellent functional outcome after CI; speech perception, nonverbal cognition, and speech performance were comparable to those of patients with DFNB1 deafness. <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> Our results do not support the variable auditory outcome reported in the literature, which may be affected by several social and environmental factors and by the genetic background.
Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) · 2000 · 0 citations · open access
Erbliche Schwerhörigkeit: neue Möglichkeiten der Diagnostik
AbstractMutations in many different genes can result in hearing loss. Using different molecular genetic methods, the disease-causing gene mutations can often be identified or at least localised to defined regions of the genome. These new diagnostic possibilities result from the localisation and identification of a number of hearing-loss genes in the last five years. Diagnostic investigations should always be accompanied by a genetic counselling of the family. In addition, the isolation thus far of 11 genes mutated in autosomal dominant inherited hearing loss, as well as of 6 genes mutated in autosomal recessive inherited hearing loss, has contributed to a better understanding of the molecular pathology of hearing loss in general. However, we are only beginning to see the whole picture, as an estimated 50 to 80 hearing loss genes remain to be discovered.
Disease module: DeepOracle (Open Targets). Structures: RDKit from PubChem SMILES. Literature: retrieved by DeepSearch across 234,678,978 indexed works (targeted per-candidate search), resolved on OpenAlex.
DeCure is a research and publication project, not medical advice and not a treatment. "DeCure for X" describes a research goal, not a claim that a cure exists. Backing a cure is a contribution to fund the research — it is not an investment, and confers no yield, royalty, equity or IP ownership. Papers are published open-access by the DeCure.ai DAO.
